Explore the fascinating fields of biology, genetics, and intelligent design with 16 in-depth interviews featuring Del Tackett and six scientists from the film.
Biologist Todd Wood takes us to a zoo full of antelope, gazelle, zebras and many other incredible creatures to discuss how natural selection operates in light their amazing designs. He then compares the evolutionary "tree of life" to the creationist "orchard of life."
Dr. Todd Wood has a BS in Biology from Liberty University in Virginia (1994) and a PhD in Biochemistry from the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, 1999). Immediately following his PhD work at Virginia, Dr. Wood accepted a position as the Director of Bioinformatics at the Clemson University Genomics Institute (Clemson, South Carolina). After working for about two years at Clemson University, Dr. Wood accepted a faculty position at Bryan College (Dayton, Tennessee) in 2002. He is now president of the Core Academy of Science.
Todd, we've talked to a number of scientists so far,
and it's clear
that to believe in the Genesis paradigm,
as opposed to the conventional paradigm,
puts you in a minority.
And that means
that it's probably tough along the way.
And so what is it about the Genesis paradigm,
and the data,
and the evidence that you see around you,
that causes you to continue to hold to that in the midst
of a whole flow of things trying to pull you another way?
It works.
And it keeps working.
That's what keeps impressing me.
It keeps dragging me back,
even when I think, maybe I should not bother,
I keep finding new ways of understanding things,
new insights into nature.
I mean, this is what science is supposed to do, right?
And, for me to read through Genesis and see
how integral it is
to basic Christian story of creation, fall,
and redemption, I don't think
that we can just reimagine all that.
And then when I go
and think about what kind of scientific insights
that I can gain from that,
it continues to impress me how much progress we're making.
If creationism is so bad and so wrong,
why is it we keep making progress?
Why do we keep -
even in geology, and in biology,
the whole nine yards all of it?
It seems like we're continually finding new insights,
and new ways of understanding things,
that suggest that we must be on the right track, I think.
So this is not just a blind faith for you.
I mean, this is something
that you see substantiated everywhere you look?
No, I don't think it's a blind faith.
I'm not even sure that I like that phrase.
I mean it implies that, you know,
there's just nothing there,
that I'm just going to believe for no reason.
But I also don't want to underestimate
the open questions.
There are a lot of hard problems
that creationists still have to sort of resolve.
But the fact that, with so few of us,
we keep finding new ways of thinking about this problem,
and that problem,
that it's like, you know, I'm on a long journey,
and I'm not to the city that I want to get to yet,
but I keep passing those signs
that tell me how many miles I got to go,
which is pretty exciting.
That tells me I'm on the right track,
I'm going the right direction.
So, that's the way I look at it.
I just find it -
I just find it really exciting,
even though I might not have all the answers
that I'd like to have yet.
Well that seems to be the -
kind of the characteristic that we're seeing
in the creationist scientists that we're talking to,
that there's an underlying confidence there,
that the scripture is right.
Absolutely, yeah.
The more I dig,
the more I work at it, the more insight I get,
the more answers I get, it's really exciting.
It's really exciting.
I can't imagine why,
you know, young science students wouldn't want to do what we do.
I mean, it's some of the coolest research
that you could possibly imagine.
But there are still these great questions to be answered,
and you're looking at the Zebras and they're all unique,
and yet all of these creatures are just -
so much complexity and diversity.
How does the standard story,
the conventional paradigm explain all of that?
Well, they would use evolution, right?
So, billions of years, random variations,
all things that are alive now,
that cactus, that zebra,
the grass here, it's all related.
We all go back to a common ancestor
that lived billions of years ago,
and through the process of mutation,
and genetic variation, and natural selection,
that's where we get the stuff that we have today.
But doesn't that imply that all of those mutations are positing,
they're all moving towards all of this diversity that we have?
Well, there certainly has to be a lot of beneficial mutations.
There could be bad stuff, I mean
that's what natural selection is going to get rid of,
because natural selection is basically killing off the stuff
that's not fit to survive.
So anything that's bad
that crops up is going to be presumably eliminated
by natural selection.
So, there can be bad mutations in the conventional model,
but yeah, you got to have good mutations, too,
to make the variety of things that we see.
You've got to have a lot of really good stuff
that happens in the history of mutation.
Does that seem reasonable?
Well, that's a good question.
I mean, from what we can see in genomes today,
we can see, yeah, I mean,
there's some mutations
that might be helpful in some circumstances,
other mutations are probably not so good,
but the vast majority of them?
They don't do anything.
They're just useless.
And so, you know,
we all have to think about mutations because we have,
when we can look inside
of a created kind, we can see differences in genetics,
so you know creationists need mutations, too.
The real question is,
you know, what kinds of mutations are happening?
So in my view, it's not a random mutation.
Just randomly changing any part of the genome is probably
not going to do much of anything, really.
What we need are mutations that are helpful and beneficial,
but those are the kinds of things that can only be built
into the system.
Evolution needs mutations
that produce an external feature that can be selected, right?
That can alter the survivability of the organism.
And sometimes that happens, sometimes it doesn't.
The vast majority of times,
there isn't going to be any external feature that
you can select for.
So we're kind of talking about how random mutations can produce
such exquisite design.
Yeah, and in some sense, it is.
It's not just mutation,
because you've got selection going on there -
so you do have features
that are clearly well designed for the environment.
So right over here, we've got these Oryx's, right?
Beautiful, beautiful creatures, and very very pale colors.
The wild range of the Oryx is right on the southern end
of the Sahara Desert.
And so, you can see, yeah, their coloration makes sense.
Natural selection,
if you get a really dark colored one,
that's going to be really easy for predators to find,
and so they end up being these really
beautiful light colors.
And that's an example
of where selection would take a variation
and turn it into an adaptation.
And that brings us back to the notion
that a really exquisite design in the beginning Oh,
I think so.
Oh, absolutely.
It has provided these creatures with the ability to survive
and to change for their benefit.
Absolutely.
So, the ability to be able to change your coloration
like that, to be able to fit an environment,
that's got to be built into the system
before it starts.
As I said,
random mutations generally don't do anything,
so it's hard to imagine
how you're going to get a lot of random mutations
that are going to actually produce
just the right coloration
for the environment that you're living in.
What about the issue of natural selection, though?
Does that have the power to get us to where we are?
That's a hot area of research.
Lots of people looking into that,
and what we find most often with natural selection is
that natural selection does a lot of fine-tuning.
Natural selection is basically all about killing off things
that aren't fit for the environment.
So if you're a Finch in the Galapagos
and you have a really tiny beak
and the only food available to you is really big,
hard seeds, you're going to die.
And that's exactly what we observe,
and so we can watch
over the generations as the beak size,
and finches, change in the Galapagos,
but they're still finches.
They're still birds.
The notion that natural
selection can generate all of the diversity we see,
that's not been demonstrated.
But that natural selection -
is that working within the kinds,
or does that allow us to go beyond that?
From my perspective,
most of the examples of natural selection are working
within the created kinds, right?
And so, now don't get me wrong,
I mean natural selection and random variation
can do amazing things,
I mean it's pretty astonishing,
the kinds of changes that we can see.
But no, they don't change from one kind to another.
We have not observed that.
All we've observed are the kinds of changes
within populations that happen.
Not even, you know, across species.
Mostly within populations, so it's very small stuff,
and that's why I call it fine-tuning,
because it's mostly taking one group of critters
and making sure that they're really fit, exactly,
for the environment where they're living.
Natural selection, then, obviously exists.
We see it around us, we see it in the fossil record.
Have you pondered
and thought about what God was doing
when He created all this that gave the potential
for natural selection to occur?
Natural selection is sort of an inevitable part of the world.
If you have random variation,
and things can die, then there's going
to be natural selection.
So before the fall,
I would say probably no natural selection going on
in the animal world at least,
but then after the fall it serves as
that fine-tuning feature, right?
So it makes sure
that the population of animals still survives,
even though the environment's fluctuating and changing.
It's just an inevitable kind
of thing that you have to have in a world
that is changing all the time.
And you know, the Flood is coming,
God knows this at creation.
So yeah, there's this system in place already -
not just to allow variations to come out of animals,
but for even the most careful adjustments to make sure
that populations don't just crash and die, go extinct.
So the tree of life that we see in the textbooks,
that is a picture
that everything started from one thing and all
of this diversity and exquisite beauty
that we see came from that one trunk,
so to speak.
So, you're right,
I mean evolution would say there is only one tree,
and it all goes back to a single common ancestor,
which is you know the base of the tree.
But I would say, no, there's actually multiple trees.
There's a felid tree,
which has all the cats on it,
there's the canid tree which has all the dogs on it,
there's the ursid tree which has all the bears on it,
there's the equid tree with all the horses on it,
and so on and so forth.
Each individual created kind,
then, has its own individual tree,
so that what you end up with is not one big tree of life,
you end up with something like an orchard or a forest,
where you have lots of different trees
all growing together from the same created base.
But this forest has trees that have a lot of branches
on it and that's
that each kind now branching out and all
of these different species that we see.
Yeah, absolutely.
So you know,
they all start at creation, right,
so they have that common beginning,
but they're individual trees,
so they're not all related to a common ancestor.
They're all related to their own individual common ancestor.
So the cat ancestor, and the horse ancestor,
and whatnot.
And so then they diversify over time,
especially after the flood,
when you have this period of massive upheaval
when critters can change all over the place.
And is that what the data shows us?
I think so.
I would start with what I read in Genesis
which tells me about, you know,
at the end of creation week,
you have all these different creatures already there,
you have flying things and swimming things
and creeping things,
and when I look at the data of nature,
I see both similarity and difference.
So an evolutionary biologist would say,
look at all the similarity,
and that puts everything on a common evolutionary tree.
Then I would say, yes, there is similarity,
but there are also significant differences.
And the significant differences - and this is really important -
they end up exactly where I would expect them to.
So I look at the Bible and I see flying things, swimming things,
that sort of thing,
and those are really big categories.
I don't see it mentioning the individual species.
You read through Genesis 1 and 2,
you won't see lions and tigers and things like that.
So it's got to be somewhere between, you know,
bird and the individual species of bird.
That's where I would expect to find these differences.
That's where I find them, over and over and over again.
It's astonishing.
And so, you know, I shouldn't be astonished,
but I am.
It always delights me when I think "Hey,
the Bible works, what do you know?"
but that's exactly how it works in this situation.
I find these differences
that essentially make sense of exactly
what I'm seeing in the Scripture.
I'm seeing those differences right there
where they should be.
As a scientist,
looking at all of this data and everything that you see,
it seems what you're saying is
that the Genesis paradigm answers all of this data better.
Yeah I think so.
I mean, ultimately I think it does
because it embraces both similarity and difference.
Now, as we've already said,
there's lots of questions that are still out there.
But, I'm pretty confident given what our paradigm can explain,
I'm very confident
that those answers are going to be found.
But in this single tree of life, in the conventional paradigm,
if that were true,
then we must have all of these transitional
forms between kinds.
Yeah, so, that's a good question.
So there are a lot of critters out there,
especially in the fossil record,
that are put forward
as these things they call transitional forms.
I like to call them intermediates.
I like to just think of them in terms of the qualities
that they possess,
rather than whether there's some sort of transition,
and in my view based on my years
of study I see two kinds of intermediates.
I see intermediates
that occur within a created kind where I can say, oh yeah,
this is this created kind.
And then I see intermediates
that appear to possess traits of more than one created kind.
So actually I have right here in my backpack, one
of those sorts of transitions.
So this...
This is a Mesohippus.
Okay?
- You'll have to explain that.
Very small, right?
Mhm.
But this is a member of the horse kind.
And if you've ever seen a horse without its skin on,
you'd say oh yeah
that looks just like a horse.
But that's not enough for a scientist.
You can't just go on
"Oh, it looks like a horse."
you got to do some statistical analysis,
and I've done that too.
So, I've used characteristics of the skull,
and the teeth here, to show that in fact,
yes, this is a horse.
It fits in the horse created kind,
it is not something else, it is definitely a horse.
So this thing is supposed to be one
of those transitional fossils,
as horses are evolving from their tiny little ancestors.
And what I'm seeing here is really just another version
of a single created kind.
Yes, it's a horse and yes,
it's different from the horses that we have today,
but the transition is only within the created kind.
Now there are others,
as I said,
there are intermediates that appear to possess traits
of more than one created kind,
but we'll have to go over to the birdhouses to check those out.
This video segment is from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 2 : Life & Design," where we explore the fascinating fields of biology, genetics, and intelligent design. Check it out on our website: http://bit.ly/2QlPtQV.
Biologist Todd Wood introduces us to the concept of 'created kinds' and then talks about how that explains the origin of species we see in the world today.
Dr. Wood has a BS in Biology from Liberty University in Virginia (1994) and a PhD in Biochemistry from the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, 1999). Immediately following his PhD work at Virginia, Dr. Wood accepted a position as the Director of Bioinformatics at the Clemson University Genomics Institute (Clemson, South Carolina). After working for about two years at Clemson University, Dr. Wood accepted a faculty position at Bryan College (Dayton, Tennessee) in 2002. He is now president of the Core Academy of Science.
For more information on Dr. Wood, please go to https://bit.ly/2N2Oraa.
亨德爾在手稿的末尾寫下了「SDG」幾個字——Soli Deo Gloria，意為「唯獨榮耀歸於上帝」。這段銘文以極快的速度寫下，使人們相信了一個傳說，即亨德爾是在受到神的啟發後熱情地創作了這首樂曲，正如他創作哈利路亞合唱曲時所說：“他看見了整個天堂”。[ 26 ]伯羅斯指出，亨德爾的許多與《彌賽亞》長度和結構相當的歌劇都是在戲劇演出季的相似時間段內創作的。在如此短的時間內創作如此多的音樂對於亨德爾和他的同時代人來說並不罕見；亨德爾在完成《彌賽亞》後一週內就開始創作他的下一部清唱劇《參孫》 ，並在一個月內完成了這部新作品的草稿。[ 28 ] [ 29 ]按照他創作新作品的慣例，亨德爾在《彌賽亞》中改編了現有的作品，其中藉鑒了兩首最近完成的意大利二重唱和一首二十年前創作的二重唱。因此， 1722 年的《Se tu non lasci amore》HWV 193 成為了《死亡啊，你的毒刺在哪裡？ 「他的軛是容易的」和「他將淨化」出自《Quel fior che all'alba ride》 HWV 192（1741 年 7 月），「一個孩子為我們而生」和「我們都像綿羊一樣」出自《Nò, di voi non vo' fidarmi》和「我們都像綿羊一樣」出自《Nò, di voi non vo' fidarmi》 HWV 189（174 月）。[ 30 ] [ 31 ]亨德爾在樂譜中的樂器使用往往不太精確，這也符合當代的慣例，即某些樂器和組合的使用是假定的，不需要作曲家寫下來；後來的抄寫員會補充細節。[ 32 ]
speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem; and cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned. The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
The Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in; behold, He shall come, saith the Lord of Hosts.
But who may abide the day of his coming and who shall stand when He appeareth? For He is like a refiner's fire.
他來的日子、誰能當得起呢．他顯現的時候、誰能立得住呢．因為他如煉金之人的火、如漂布之人的鹼。
7. 他必要潔淨（合唱）3'31"
Malachi 3:3
瑪拉基書3:3
And He shall purify the sons of Levy, that they may offer unto the Lord an offering of righteousness.
他必要潔淨，那利未的子孫，他們就憑著公義奉獻將供物獻給耶和華，奉獻給主。
8. 因此、必有童女懷孕生子 （女低音） 0'43"
Isaiah 7:14
以賽亞書 7:14
Behold! A virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Emmanuel,
因此、主自己要給你們一個兆頭、必有童女懷孕生子、給他起名叫以馬內利。
Matthew 1:23
馬太福音1:23
God with us.
神與我們同在
9. 傳報好信息給錫安（合唱）7'22"
Isaiah 40:9
以賽亞書 40:9
O thou that tellest good tidings of Zion, get thee up into the high mountain; O thou that tellest good tidings to Jerusalem, lift up thy voice with strength; lift it up, be not afraid; say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God! Arise, shine, for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee.
For, behold, darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people; but the Lord shall arise upon thee
and His glory shall be seen upon thee, and the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.
看哪、黑暗遮蓋大地、幽暗遮蓋萬民。耶和華卻要顯現照耀你、他的榮耀要現在你身上。
萬國要來就你的光、君王要來就你發現的光輝。
11. 在黑暗中行走的百姓 （男低音） 4'51"
Isaiah 9:2
以賽亞書 9:2
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light; and they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.
在黑暗中行走的百姓、看見了大光。住在死蔭之地的人、有光照耀他們。
12. 因有一嬰孩為我們而生 （合唱） 4'49"
Isaiah 9:6
以賽亞書 9:6
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulder; and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace.
Then shall the eyes of the blind be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped;
then shall the lame leap as a hart, and the tongue of the dumb shall sing.
那時瞎子的眼必睜開、聾子的耳必開通。
那時瘸子必跳躍像鹿、啞吧的舌頭必能歌唱．
20. 他必牧養自己的羊群 （女低音及女高音） 6'12"
Isaiah 40:11
以賽亞書 40:11
He shall feed his flock like a shepherd, and He shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his bosom, and gently lead those that are with young.
他必像牧人牧養自己的羊群、用膀臂聚集羊羔抱在懷中、慢慢引導那乳養小羊的。
Matthew 11:28-29
馬太福音 11:28-29
Come unto him, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and He will give you rest.
Take his yoke upon you, and learn of him, for He is meek and lowly of heart, and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
凡勞苦擔重擔的人、可以到我這裡來、我就使你們得安息。
我心裡柔和謙卑、你們當負我的軛、學我的樣式、這樣、你們心裡就必得享安息。
21. 我的軛是容易的 （合唱） 3'03"
Matthew 11:30
馬太福音 11:30
His yoke is easy, and His burthen is light.
因為我的軛是容易的、我的擔子是輕省的。
第二部分
22. 看哪、神的羔羊 （合唱）
John 1:29
約翰福音 1:29
Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world.
He was despisèd and rejected of men: a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief.
他被藐視、被人厭棄、多受痛苦、常經憂患。
Isaiah 50:6
以賽亞書 50:6
He gave His back to the smiters, and His cheeks to them that plucked off the hair: He hid not His face from shame and spitting.
人打我的背、我任他打．人拔我腮頰的鬍鬚、我由他拔．人辱我吐我、我並不掩面。
24. 他誠然擔當我們的憂患 （合唱）
Isaiah 53:4-5
以賽亞書 53:4-5
Surely He hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows;
He was wounded for our transgressions. He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace was upon Him.
他誠然擔當我們的憂患、背負我們的痛苦．
那知他為我們的過犯受害、為我們的罪孽壓傷．因他受的刑罰我們得平安．
25. 因他受的鞭傷我們得醫治 （合唱）
Isaiah 53:5
以賽亞書 53:5
And with His stripes we are healèd.
因他受的鞭傷我們得醫治。
26. 我們都如羊 （合唱）
Isaiah 53:6
以賽亞書 53:6
All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turnèd every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all.
我們都如羊走迷、各人偏行己路．耶和華使我們眾人的罪孽都歸在 他身上。
27. 凡看見我的都嗤笑我 （男高音）
Psalm 22:7
詩篇 22:7
All they that see Him, laugh Him to scorn, they shoot out their lips, and shake their heads saying,
凡看見我的都嗤笑我．他們撇嘴搖頭、說,
28. 他把自己交託耶和華、耶和華可以救他罷 （合唱）
Psalm 22:8
詩篇 22:8
He trusted in God that He would deliver Him; let Him deliver Him, if He delight in Him.
他把自己交託耶和華、耶和華可以救他罷．耶和華既喜悅他、可以搭救他罷。
29. 辱罵傷破了我的心 （男高音）
Psalm 69:20
詩篇 69:20
Thy rebuke hath broken His heart; He is full of heaviness.He looked for some to have pity on Him, but there was no man; neither found He any to comfort Him.
辱罵傷破了我的心．我又滿了憂愁．我指望有人體恤、卻沒有一個．我指望有人安慰、卻找不著一個。
30. 你們要觀看、有像這臨到我的痛苦沒有 （男高音）
Lamentations 1:12
耶利米哀歌 1:12
Behold, and see if there be any sorrow like unto His sorrow.
你們要觀看、有像這臨到我的痛苦沒有、
31. 因受欺壓和審判他被奪去 （男高音）
Isaiah 53:8
以賽亞書 53:8
He was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of Thy people was He stricken.
因受欺壓和審判他被奪去．至於他同世的人、誰想他受鞭打、從活人之地被剪除、是因我百姓的罪過呢。
32. 因為你必不將我的靈魂撇在陰間 （男高音）
Psalm 16:10
詩篇 16:10
But Thou didst not leave His soul in hell; nor didst Thou suffer Thy Holy One to see corruption.
因為你必不將我的靈魂撇在陰間．也不叫你的聖者見朽壞。
33. 眾城門哪、你們要抬起頭來 （合唱）
Psalm 24:7-10
詩篇 24:7-10
Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in.
Who is the King of glory?The Lord strong and mighty, the Lord mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in. Who is the King of glory?The Lord of Hosts, He is the King of Glory.
Unto which of the Angels said He at any time, Thou art My son, this day have I begotten thee?
所有的天使、 神從來對那一個說、『你是我的兒子、我今日生你。』
35. 神的使者都要拜他 （合唱） 1'37"
Hebrews 1:6
希伯來書 1:6
Let all the angels of God worship Him.
神的使者都要拜他。
36. 你已經升上高天 （男低音） 3'59"
Psalm 68:18
詩篇 68:18
Thou art gone up on high; Thou hast led captivity captive, and received gifts for men, yea, even from thine enemies, that the Lord God might dwell among them.
你已經升上高天、擄掠仇敵、你在人間、就是在悖逆的人間、受了供獻、叫耶和華 神可以與他們同住。
37. 主發命令 （合唱） 1'12"
Psalm 68:11
詩篇 68:11
The Lord gave the word, great was the company of the preachers.
主發命令、傳好信息的婦女成了大群。
38. 他們的腳蹤何等佳美 （女高音） 3'05"
Romans 10:15
羅馬書 10:15
How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things.
報福音傳喜信的人、他們的腳蹤何等佳美。
39. 他們的聲音傳遍天下 （合唱） 1'43"
Romans 10:18
羅馬書 10:18
Their sound is gone out into all lands, and their words unto the ends of the world.
他們的聲音傳遍天下、他們的言語傳到地極。
40. 外邦為甚麼爭鬧 （男低音） 2'53"
Psalms 2:1-2
詩篇 2:1-2
Why do the nations so furiously rage together, and why do the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth rise up, and the rulers take counsel together against the Lord, and against His Annointed.
外邦為甚麼爭鬧、萬民為甚麼謀算虛妄的事。
世上的君王一齊起來、臣宰一同商議、要敵擋耶和華、並他的受膏者
41. 我們要掙開他們的捆綁 （合唱） 1'49"
Psalms 2:3
詩篇 2:3
Let us break their bonds asunder, and cast away their yokes from us.
我們要掙開他們的捆綁、脫去他們的繩索。
42. 那坐在天上的 （男高音） 0'22"
Psalms 2:4
詩篇 2:4
He that dwelleth in heaven shall laugh them to scorn; the Lord shall have them in derision.
那坐在天上的必發笑．主必嗤笑他們。
43. 你必打破他們 （男高音） 2'10"
Psalms 2:9
詩篇 2:9
Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; Thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.
Worthy is the Lamb that was slain, and hath redeemed us to God by his blood, to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing.
Blessing, and honour, glory and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb, for ever and ever Amen.
.jpg)
![[icon]](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small}